Cost-Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for the Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: A Systematic Review
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND For the treatment of depressive disorders, the framework of collaborative care has been recommended, which showed improved outcomes in the primary care sector. Yet, an earlier literature review did not find sufficient evidence to draw robust conclusions on the cost-effectiveness of collaborative care. PURPOSE To systematically review studies on the cost-effectiveness of collaborative care, compared with usual care for the treatment of patients with depressive disorders in primary care. METHODS A systematic literature search in major databases was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Methodological quality of the articles was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) list. To ensure comparability across studies, cost data were inflated to the year 2012 using country-specific gross domestic product inflation rates, and were adjusted to international dollars using purchasing power parities (PPP). RESULTS In total, 19 cost-effectiveness analyses were reviewed. The included studies had sample sizes between n = 65 to n = 1,801, and time horizons between six to 24 months. Between 42% and 89% of the CHEC quality criteria were fulfilled, and in only one study no risk of bias was identified. A societal perspective was used by five studies. Incremental costs per depression-free day ranged from dominance to US$PPP 64.89, and incremental costs per QALY from dominance to US$PPP 874,562. CONCLUSION Despite our review improved the comparability of study results, cost-effectiveness of collaborative care compared with usual care for the treatment of patients with depressive disorders in primary care is ambiguous depending on willingness to pay. A still considerable uncertainty, due to inconsistent methodological quality and results among included studies, suggests further cost-effectiveness analyses using QALYs as effect measures and a time horizon of at least 1 year.
منابع مشابه
مراکز سلامت روان جامعهنگر در ایران: طراحی خدمات مبتنی بر شواهد
Objectives: Service delivery through Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs) is a strategy for improving urban mental health. The current paper presents the process of designing structure and planning the services for CMHCs through an evidence-based approach. Method: Using a systematic review approach, the needs and available mental health services in urban areas, and effectiveness and cost-eff...
متن کاملخدمات مؤثر جامعهنگر برای مبتلایان به اختلالهای روانپزشکی کدامند؟ مروری بر شواهد
Objectives : The study aimed at reviewing evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of community-based services for psychiatric disorders. Method: Cochrane and PubMed bibliographic databases and reference lists of relevant studies were investigated. Systematic reviews and controlled randomized clinical trials were analyzed. The inclusion criteria were having effectiveness and cost-effe...
متن کاملCost-effectiveness of collaborative care for the treatment of major depressive disorder in primary care. A systematic review
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of collaborative care for patients with major depressive disorder in primary care has been established. Assessing its cost-effectiveness is important for deciding on implementation. This review therefore evaluates the cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for major depressive disorder in primary care. METHODS A systematic search on economic evaluations of colla...
متن کاملTreatment costs, cost offset, and cost-effectiveness of collaborative management of depression.
OBJECTIVE The report estimates the treatment costs, cost-offset effects, and cost-effectiveness of Collaborative Care of depressive illness in primary care. STUDY DESIGN Treatment costs, cost-offset effects, and cost-effectiveness were assessed in two randomized, controlled trials. In the first randomized trail (N = 217), consulting psychiatrists provide enhanced management of pharmacotherapy...
متن کاملEconomic evaluation of resistant major depressive disorder treat-ment in Iranian population: a comparison between repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with electroconvulsive
Background: It is estimated that major depression disorders constitute 8.2% of years lived with disability (YLDs) globally. The repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) are two relative common interventions to treat major depressive disorders, especially for treatment resistant depression. In this study the cost- effectiveness and cost-utility of r...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 10 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015